FRONT PAGE : | TECH | Op-Ed Page | About | Advertise | List
THCB UPDATE Get email updates of new posts and industry news.
facebook

April 15, 2005

POLICY: Krugman on the international health care context

Paul Krugman has a great column out about the international health care context, called The Medical Money Pit. There's nothing new or original that THCB readers or Health Affairs readers won't already know. We spend more and basically get less, but we lead the league in surgeons driving Porsches. But it's very good that someone is raising this issue outside of pure policy wonk circles. Even Krugman seems stunned that our government spends so much more per head than other governments which cover all their people, and all we get for it is Medicare for seniors and crappy coverage for the very poor. And by the way those numbers don't count the role of the Feds and states as employers paying for health care coverage for 10 million government workers--if you add that in, the government share of spending is higher (although that math doesn't really matter as we don't cover any more people because of which column you put the spending in).

What Krugman doesn't say is that, in general, government spending in those other countries guarantees a basic level of care for everyone, and that the rich (even in the UK, but not in Canada) can trade up with their own money for a nicer class of waiting room or to jump the line. And they do, and there's not only nothing wrong with that.  It doesn't destroy the basic fabric of the social system.  And if we had universal health care here, it would be true here too, and there would be nothing for those in the upper social tiers here to be afraid about.  But you won't find that rumor getting out when this gets discussed politically.

April 15, 2005 in Policy | Permalink

Comments

I explain why Krugman is so off base on my blog at www.businessword.com. What a bunch hogwash.

Posted by: Donald E. L. Johnson | Apr 15, 2005 3:09:15 PM

>>>>
What Krugman doesn't say is that, in general, government spending in those other countries guarantees a basic level of care for everyone, and that the rich (even in the UK, but not in Canada) can trade up with their own money for a nicer class of waiting room or to jump the line.
>>>>

Yes. Not only the rich, as there are cheap health insurance policies that pay for immediate treatment when there's an NHS waiting list of more than 6 weeks (I bet the companies wish they'd never written those policies!), or only cover certain conditions (because the NHS handles some quickly and well) etc.. And some people choose to pay per visit. The people in clinics at my local private hospital are certainly not rich.

Not that I like a two-tier system, nor that I think the US should copy the current UK system

(note to Donald: I'm dropping in on your site now!)

Posted by: Jayanne | Apr 15, 2005 5:32:06 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.